User talk:Tesla

Codex categories
Just a heads-up; codex categories that represent actual sections within a player's codex are supposed to include a space within the sort name. I mention this because you removed that space from several categories earlier today. -- Heaven&#39;s Agent 01:25, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I removed them because I did not know that. Now that I do know that they aren't to be sorted by alphabetical order, I won't do that again. Tesla 01:49, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I understand; I figured that was likely the case. I was just letting you know. -- Heaven&#39;s Agent 02:08, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Also, please refrain from creating codex entry articles that lack any specific information about the entry. A red link is preferable to an unmarked stub article entirely devoid of relevant information. -- Heaven&#39;s Agent 01:32, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * As for those codex pages, I am currently doing 2 jobs - My boss, Pawel, knows this. So during the day hours and up until about 5 minutes ago, I was on the laptop at another location. I had to save my work and go home to where I can continue to work and put in the rest of the information from my home pc. I am making them that way to be able to have an easier access link to build the page and then fill in the information I can. So please do not change those. Thanks. Tesla 01:49, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't plan to remove them, so long as you've got a plan to put into motion. I did change the formatting a bit on some of them to conform to the style established elsewhere, and added stub tags to them until they can be finalized. -- Heaven&#39;s Agent 02:08, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Yup. Plan in motion for sure. Sorry about the formatting. Doing what I can and I've been trying to make them look good. I need to crop the images from my screen shots. ^^ So thanks again! Tesla 02:27, 13 December 2011 (UTC)


 * No problems; let me know if you need any help. -- Heaven&#39;s Agent 02:35, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Re: Duplicate Articles
The in-game codex actually lists it in the singular tense, as does the DarthHaterDB (http://db.darthhater.com/codex/632/rodian/ link]). This is one of the problems of adding content that we don't personally witness: we don't catch the errors. As for searching for what links somewhere, that's usually not something that needs to be done when deleting an article that duplicates preexisting content. It was an oversight on my part, and I do apologize for that.

I do want to ask you to refrain from changing actual wikilinks to Category links. Links within the body of an article should lead to another page within the primary namespace of the project, even if that page should not exist yet. Red links are a tool that lets us and new contributors know that an article that is intended to be included has not yet been written. You should also start marking incomplete codex entries with the tag, and if they are being taken from the DB the tag as well. -- Heaven&#39;s Agent 15:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)