Snugglemuffin and Lover

Who added "snugglemuffin" and "lover" to the Smuggler/Jedi Sage roles..? Maybe I'm just not far enough into the game to get that, if there is a real point to it... and if there is, I think it should be noted in trivia or something... :P Or, just removed as I think it probably will be. LordSchmee (talk) 23:18, January 4, 2013 (UTC)

Apparantly the same person who pointed out the 'small gopher named Stephen' in the Warzones.Larry Fuqua (talk) 04:02, January 5, 2013 (UTC)


Best to have both a page and a category for it. Ausir(talk) 20:18, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Smuggler Advanced Classes

As the Gunslinger and Scoundrel remain unconfirmed as Advanced Classes for the Smuggler, I have removed them from the article for now. When and if they are released by the developers, we can add them again. Until then their inclusion is nothing more than rumor, even though it is originating from a generally reliable source. -- Heaven's Agent 15:20, July 21, 2010 (UTC)


This page should be removed and redirected/combined with the category because it is needlessly redundant.Pirplepig 15:47, April 18, 2011 (UTC)

  • I strongly disagree: Category is just that, a dynamic list of pages containing similar subject. This page then contains the context, explanations of things. They serve a different purpose and combining them to one page would cause just more redundancy than this, not to mention that Category namespace is not the place for the information this article holds. –Tm_T (Talk) 19:16, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
  • An article is needed to provide an explanation on Advanced Classes (as Tm T said) not to just provide a list of the games advanced classes. The fact that the article contains little information about them isn't relevant to that fact right now. Their is information from the official swtor site on Advanced classes and the article could use touching up with information from what we know. Alexsau1991 (talk page) 20px 21:11, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
Then the body of the Category page should be removed and a basic blurb with a link to the category page should be prefable. The info being redudntant isactually the issue since one is being maintained and the other is not.Pirplepig 00:31, April 19, 2011 (UTC)Pirplepig 17:56, April 19, 2011 (UTC)

Third tree

Third trees should be added as they are revield. I am not too sure what has been since I normally only pay attention to sith side classes.Pirplepig 17:57, April 19, 2011 (UTC)

I do not bleieve that the shared tree should be placed here as this page is just about the advanced classes. By placing the shared tree below each set of AC, it is making it appear that there is a third advance class, which there is not. The shared tree should be brought up in the advanced class articles themselves and in the starter class article, not in the advanced class article. Scimatt16 21:04, April 19, 2011 (UTC)

It is implied in the blog that you can put as many points in the shared tree as you want, forgoing the main trees of an AC. So even though the third tree does not define the AC it does define the class and you will be spnding skill points here also. Pirplepig 04:09, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

Perhaps placing the trees under each AC as a secondary bullet would be better and clearer.Pirplepig 04:27, April 20, 2011 (UTC)

Are we going to include skill trees here or get rid of them? I currently set the shared trees to a secondary bullet to alleviate confusion, but this should be decided since there are many more skill trees that can be included.Pirplepig 03:50, April 21, 2011 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.